Improvements in technology bring improvements in quality of life. Technology improves more rapidly with a larger population. Larger populations mean fewer resources (including personal space) per capita, which decreases quality of life. Hence the trade off; somewhere there is an optimal balance...
Quality of life has improved with technology. Does the rate of improvement of technology increase with population size? Perhaps - but it's a trade-off.
Yeah last time I looked it was around 7billion. Which just fits to show :) I don’t disagree that 10 billion people or maybe even 20 billion people could be sustained at some level but what about quality of life? Anyway it’s a moot point really, I guess it’s up to the rest of the 8 billion what...
And that is the problem - an almost a 50% increase in the number of humans on the planet. I just don't think we have the structures (political, social) or technology to support that number of people at least not with a decent standard of living. Fully agree on the colonisation aspiration, which...
Send her to the ducking stool then burn her! Although I don't think she has a cat so maybe she's innocent after all? Anyway congrats to whoever that dude is for one of the funniest videos of '23.
I don't want to kill people or impose any sort of fascist doctrine, but I do think the world is overpopulated. Carbon aside, too many people competing for resources (and by resources I include space to live) is not a good thing and is probably the root of a lot of conflict. So if there is a way...
The landings were obviously fake, the moon is far too small to land on as you can see for yourself if you look up at night. Plus it's made of cheese but apparently no-one scooped some up from the surface and made a sandwich? Case closed.