No worries there. Those who think fixed targets shouldn't be used have a completely different philosophy on extracting profits from the market than those of us who use them. I am only interested in consistency, not maximizing my ticks in a trade, and I believe using appropriately sized targets...
Thank you for responding. I've been going back and forth between 8 and 10 ticks based purely on observation, so nice to see that it's pretty much in line with what you've found statistically.
Hi NoD,
Thank you for your response. Perhaps I did not phrase my question clearly. I'm not so much interested in how you use the 20 MA, but your reasoning as to why you believe it provides S/R?
Just curious for your reasoning behind a 20 period MA providing support during a pullback, as opposed to support that is created by actual price. And why 20, not 19 or 21?
Well obviously if you have them on 2 different settings (as you did) you are going to get different results, but on the same setting they are absolutely identical. Anyhow, not a big deal, just thought I'd point it out :)
It is interesting that you prefer W %R and believe that it gives you clearer signals, considering the %k of the stoch provides an identical trace to the W %R. Larry sure must have been one heck of a salesman :)
Does anyone know where I can find the 'official' RTH Open price for the day? I tried the CME website but could only find the full session open. Thanks!
What part does the size of the pullback play to indicate a potential setup? It appears from what you have described that you're looking for a smaller sized pullback (< z bars) that then fails to make a HH as a potential reversal?
I see, thank you for the explanation. What are you using to obtain bid-ask data for 10+ years back?
Also, could you further clarify what you mean by "providing you do not alter the format then the relativities contained within the macro view are maintained"?