All of these are as nothing compared to the Greek shepherd circle-jerk, which can be expanded indefinitely to achieve any desired level of computational accuracy.
That's what I consider a scalp, also. But I wouldn't consider using limit orders. To me a scalp is opportunistic, a momo play. You want in and out when you want in and out.
IMO NQ is the best of the three because of the combination of volatility, tick size, payout, and margin.
ES leads YM...
Truth to tell, when I first started reading WSJ in my twenties, I thought I would be a customer for the grand Colorado chalets, the Bentleys, the Rolexes, and the fine slinky babes in the ads. Just bitter, now, I guess.
Bizarrely, PrisonPlanet sometimes provides an economic heads-up. Like when months ago they ranted against El Presidente's scuttling of coal. Yesterday we saw coal scuttled.
I use Market Watch News Viewer and ZeroHedge. And of course, for the very best, ET! When it got so that I liked the financial articles in Vanity Fair better, I knew the WSJ was doomed.
Maybe is better in your part of the world. The US edition quit being hard hitting a couple of years ago for me and become more heavily US slanted. Whereas before I enjoyed its more global view.
The last thing I recall being worth a shit in the WSJ as the expose many years ago of blatant fraud...
Agreed on Barron's. Stopped years ago even reading it for free in the libes. Another thing not missed is egregious product placement in financial rags. Might as well be TV or movies.
For most of my adult life I have read the WSJ almost every day. Early this year each time I read it, I started asking myself, "Was I truly and usefully informed, or was I merely entertained?" I am now in my third week after cancelling the subscription. I do miss the entertainment.