Why is that? Mathematics are always 'right'....
Find mathematics so you sell higher than you buy....; if you can successfully accomplish this with quick enough data and quick enough trades, which is a huge caveat, then what is the problem?
I use everything literally from the ground up. While I am quite unexceptional and ignorant when it comes to the stock market, I am quite exceptional at mathematics and programming
Yes, exactly! It is theoretical perception with my sole purpose to test feasibility in the real world.
No shit
Seriously, you suck at reading comprehension.
Mathematically speaking, what you said only becomes an issue with either low liquidity/volatility stocks or one purchasing extremely large amount of stocks at once and then trying to sell extremely large amounts.
I don't have pipe dreams, I have numerical analysis and mathematics. You have...
The problem is that somehow it has got misinterpreted that I said this WOULD work. I have put numerous constraints which I have said are yet to be tested and optimized before it could even be truly tested for feasibility.
Also for who asked, I am talking about 0.5% gain per day
Lol then do it, (you clearly have no idea what you are talking about).
a 0.5% daily return would be quite impressive....do you realize what kind of return that is?
You have to be trolling, you can't be so stupid...it's not possible
Any daytrader would give is left nut to make 0.5% a day
This particular algorithm is Close.previous to wherever the exit point is reached.
With enough data, I will be able to optimize the the stop and that optimization may be 0.5% or it could be 10%....Oh, I agree 100% that it wont at all, this stop is for the sole purpose of minimizing loss in...
Yup.
This was my line of thought, hence the reason I will be programatically trading if the algorithms prove to be sound.
This is also why I want tick by tick data, I don't want to have to interpolate or extrapolate any data, even if it is just for a minute