Recent content by scott_miller

Most of these are big companies, but I don't think it's left and right hand not knowing the other exists. It's just more of the same from them.

Nothing is normal when an entire industry is disrupted like this. Being a business that affects both consumers and companies across the board and losing revenue so fast is a first.

With an MBA - yes, for now. But in broader terms I think entire industries are changing too fast for universities and colleges to adapt and provide a "guarantee" - a diploma - that you are an expert in the field.

In a time where degrees are decreasing in value, this is just another step in the direction of online (and free) education.

All numbers are supplemented one way or another, but usually the big ones reflect where there is real impact - client shifts, new products etc. Net income is indeed clearer (as a rule of thumb.. in 70% of cases), but not always.

Longevity as a trader is something really hard to achieve. Though I'm not sure we're in the same race as these guys.

And here's an article about what the unemployed are really doing - http://qz.com/516023/if-nearly-40-of-americans-arent-working-what-are-they-doing/

I don't think these rules are old. They could possibly be complemented by some new social ratings to gauge sentiment, but not replaced. Not even displaced. My own process starts with a more general filter of companies that have a perceived edge both in fundamental and technical terms. Then I...

It's like playing roulette with three-four zeros. It's possible to win for a certain period by using forex knowledge, but it's the timing that gets you in the end with the expirations of the options. Steer clear.

Keep up the pressure, message and email them.. next thing they'll say you need to deposit more money to make a withdrawal..

Heed the Forex Peace Army warning, keep sending them some emails, but don't put too much effort into it. But do your due diligence before depositing next time.

It's funny how the image of Saxo has gone downhill in recent times, all this just confirms it..

What I'm trying to say is that markets have their own "time". As they are a collective representation of buying and selling by a large number of entities - and with algorithms it's not only people, banks and funds that are doing it - they don't necessarily follow the circadian rhythm of human...

The thing is, markets don't move on a day to day basis. Yes, there is spike or dip at the start and/or end of a trading session (obviously not for forex), but these tend to even out. This makes it pointless to have a daily p/l target. Which doesn't mean day trading doesn't have its merits, but...

Earnings and rate hike will probably make it harder for the bulls, but let's just see when exactly it'll come and what direction they'll point at.