Recent content by mistermark

babak: "Fact: trading performance of shortboy.com is as follows: 1999 8.39% (half year) 2000 18.67% (full year) 2001 5.3% (up to now) Calling the above "good money" is a stretch to say the least. Especially considering that 2000 was manna from heaven for short sellers after years...

or I wouldn't have come to the defense of shortboy. You stop your misinformation, and I won't come back to correct your distortions. As the evidence shows, a few posters have been irked by Babak's constant distortions and falsehoods. And all were started by Babak. It's plain and simple...

don't see any hype, vvv, just some debate. Show me the hype, if you can find any, which you can't. As for "unsubstantiated claims and unaudited results", ask Babak if this is the case. He seems to have followed shortboy for a while. In any event, I defend the site I subscribe to, and I...

what shortboy has made trading. Is it something like $200,000 over 2 years? And your trying to tell us that's not good money? Shame on you. Jealousy is an ugly emotion. Mark === jealousy is an ugly emotion

Babak: "Here is my comment re Bill's profitability (trading only): In 1999 8.39% [note: half year June start] In 2000 18.67% In 2001 1.96% (so far)" Your 2001 figure is a LIE! And my mother told me that when you catch someone in 1 lie, that he/she very well may have a problem with...

Just wanted to say this. And sorry about the prolonged arguement last night. I got caught up with a few irrational's, and I should know better than trying to debate an irrational person. Now only trading stuff... Mark (a new member)

This is my post "Babak, I understand your point. But the SEC mandates as an accounting principle that ALL income derived from an account be used to calculate the percentage return from that particular account. So my guess is since he does not mark the "interest" as green or red like...

You saying that the moderator of this board is secretly hiding behind another identity? All you need is 1 brain cell to realize what a crock that is. What's with the people here? Mark

posted at 7:52pm ". But the SEC mandates as an accounting principle that ALL income derived from an account be used to calculate the percentage return from that particular account." That's what I said. Where is the word website? Shame, shame, shame. Mark

Turok, now I see you are a complete moron. You SHOW me where I said it is a SEC rule to include interest income on a website. You won't be able to, b/c I never said that, and you are a liar! What I said, and its clear as day, please recheck the post, is that it is an SEC accounting law...

Could not have said it better myself, shortnfool. Bravo. I don't know if you like football, but Keyshawn Johnson once said, "just give me the damn ball." I say "just give me the damn trade" I don't want fluff, and I dont want a complicated site. I want the simplicity and effectiveness...

babak, I got your math now, ignorance = $200,000 in TRADING profits in 2 years. I got one for you: jealousy is an ugly emotion. Mark

turok, Now I've read your post, and like shortnfool said, you're really in the bigtime with your trades, you showed shortboy. You make shortboy's profits of $200,000 look like, well $200,000. O.k. what about the SEC? It's there accounting law and we're in agreement on that. So now what's...

shortnfool, You are so correct! And it's great to be talking to another happy subscriber. Funny how there are no "unhappy" suscribers" voicing their opinions here. And I will listen to your wisdom, and not waste my time with these 2 posters, who are obviously out to slander, misrepresent...

Turok, you say "What a crock -- if I want to use my web site to brag about my trading prowess and in the course of said bragging I don't include my "interest prowess", I'm betting I won't be taking any calls from the SEC." Your the joke, talking without any knowledge. Where's the bragging...