Like half glass of water.
Some people see it as half full while the other see it as half empty.
Even god can't do everything right in everyone's eyes :D
Well, the judge hasn't really defined if the term "natural born" means a person was born out of vagina.
So, we need to the USSC to define that and we need the president to prove he came out of one.
/sarcasm
And you are still arguing about something that doesn't need to be argued.
Why do you need someone or some group to tell you exactly word by word what it means by "Natural Born" before you can acknowledge what it already means naturally?
Natural Born should already means born on own...
LOL no
YOU are the one who's confusing about your own confusing.
This is what you posted on post #9 of this thread:
Lets try again
This is what you posted on post #9 of this thread:
How about one last time?
This is what you posted on post #9 of this thread:
And I wasn't...
He wanted the USSC to define it, then he's got it.
There is already a legal precedence by the USSC since 1898.
I posted it in the previous page, but in case anyone still missed it, here's the case:
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)...
Not sure if you're just trolling or really believe what you posted, but USSC has already ruled on the definition of Natural Born Citizen since 1898.
See the USSC decision: United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong_Kim_Ark
"The citizenship status...
did a bit of googling and found these links
http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Short_Sales_-_Open_at_Year-End
http://invest-faq.com/cbc/tax-short-sales.html
This should give you an idea on how to report open short sales.