Recent content by FCT

  1. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    You contribute yourself quite a bit, so here you go. Inverse of your covariance matrix times the vector of expected returns. That’ll give you the uncontrained MV weights (not minimum variance, which does not use expected returns), which can then be scaled to constant return, unit length...
  2. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    You’re fast! Pretty cool stuff.
  3. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    GAT, I’d like to compliment you. The current situation in global markets is volatile and a lot of stuff is happening on a daily basis. There are many charlatans in general and most info is rubbish / fake. You’ve done well for yourself, but more so, continue to provide very useful information to...
  4. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    Makes sense. On the clearing smoke: so you see anything particularly interesting to buy in the current environment. The time seems right to buy stuff, but what? Oil looks good, equities in general, gold already rebounded. Some ETFs have huge discounts, but that does not seem to be an extra...
  5. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    Hi Rob, I love the stuff you’re doing and sharing. Now that you’re getting less dividends your futures trading ATM is paying out, you gotta ‘love it when a plan comes together’. You are systematic, caution against biases and take the emotion out of trading. What surprises me though, is that...
  6. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    Thanks - interesting!
  7. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    I’m intrigued by the ‘quirks in the SET50’ comment. What does this mean?
  8. F

    Rolling forward futures contracts

    Yes - this could possibly guide the execution decision. In one-tick markets it might make sense to take liquidity. But looks like you have historical trade data to back this up. Interesting, thanks.
  9. F

    Rolling forward futures contracts

    I’m still thinking about this... My original example was a market with a 2 tick bid-ask spread. It seems that this changes when the bid-ask is 1 tick. Continuing with the buy order example: if the market stays or ticks lower, you’ll save 0.5 ticks relative to mid. But if the market ticks up, you...
  10. F

    Rolling forward futures contracts

    ‘my slippage cost would have doubled’ - can I check my intuition? Suppose the market is 99-101 (ie, mid of 100) and you want to buy. You queue at 99. Assume there’s 50% probability of the market moving up and 50% probability of moving down (not unreasonable at this frequency). If the market...
  11. F

    Rolling forward futures contracts

    A ‘spread combo order’ sounds like a ‘synthetic’ spread that still trades two individual legs. In most markets, calendar spreads actively trade, sometimes with lower tick size than the outrights. Take the VIX futures as an example (outright spread 0.05, calendars 0.01). Does IB not support this...
  12. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    This is good news for us in ‘the community’, and I look very much forward to updates or anything you’re willing to share. I’m especially curious how accurate a backtest is for intraday trading. I believe that many intraday backtests turn from firmly positive after TC to very negative once you...
  13. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    Is this futures-only, GAT? I think -4% YTD is actually ‘good’ - most trend followers are substantially below that. On statistical significance: I think that if you test how ‘abnormal’ the last few years have been given the returns before that (backtest or actual track records), the null of no...
  14. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    Interesting phenomenon, tx for explaining, although I’m surprised by the fact that ‘everyone is rolling short’ as futures are in zero net supply. I’d also imagine that this is an ‘enforceable arbitrage’, since dividend futures and interest rates can be traded to lock in any mispricing. Is this...
  15. F

    Fully automated futures trading

    Yes, bid-ask is what I meant. On fair value: even if you think that the current contract you’re exiting is ‘too cheap’, the next contract you’ll be entering into is likely to be be ‘cheap’ too, isn’t it? If this works reliably, it is an independent signal I’d argue.
Back
Top